tqqq: What's the deal?

AI's "People Also Ask" is Just a Mirror Reflecting Our Dumbest Questions

So, you're telling me AI is now curating the "People Also Ask" section? Give me a break. The whole point of that thing was to aggregate actual questions people were punching into Google. Now we're letting the robots decide what we're curious about? This is peak idiocracy.

The Echo Chamber of Algorithmic Curiosity

Let's be real, "People Also Ask" was already a pretty questionable feature. It was like looking into a digital mirror and seeing the collective anxieties of the internet reflected back at you. "Is coffee bad for me?" "How do I get rich quick?" The usual suspects. But at least there was a human element to it, even if it was a disturbingly basic one.

Now, we're handing the reins over to algorithms. Algorithms that, let's not forget, are trained on the very data they're now curating. It's a feedback loop of epic proportions. They're learning what questions we ask, then feeding us back those same questions, subtly shaping our "curiosity" to fit their pre-programmed biases. What could possibly go wrong? I mean, offcourse, we are talking about AI here.

It's like asking a parrot to write a symphony. Sure, it can mimic the sounds, but does it actually understand the music? Does it have any genuine curiosity about the world, or is it just regurgitating what it's been fed? And more importantly, who's deciding what the parrot gets fed in the first place?

When AI Starts Asking the Questions

The bigger issue here isn't just the dumbing down of curiosity; it's the creeping sense that we're losing control of the narrative. We're outsourcing our intellectual exploration to machines that, at the end of the day, are just glorified calculators.

And what happens when AI starts generating questions we weren't asking? When it starts subtly nudging us toward certain topics, framing the conversation in ways that benefit… well, whoever's pulling the strings behind the algorithm? This isn't some sci-fi dystopia; it's happening right now, in the seemingly innocuous "People Also Ask" section of your Google search.

Are we really that intellectually bankrupt that we need AI to tell us what to be curious about? Have we become so passive and uninspired that we're willing to let algorithms dictate our intellectual journey? Maybe I'm just being a grumpy old Luddite, but something about this feels deeply wrong.

The Illusion of Choice

The problem isn't that AI is inherently evil or malicious. The problem is that it's a tool, and like any tool, it can be used for good or ill. And right now, it feels like it's being used to create the illusion of choice, the illusion of curiosity, while subtly steering us toward a pre-determined destination.

It's like being offered a menu with a hundred items, only to discover that they all taste exactly the same. You think you're making a choice, but you're really just reinforcing the status quo. And that, my friends, is a recipe for intellectual stagnation.

So, What's the Point of Even Asking?

This whole thing stinks of lazy corporate "innovation" and a complete disregard for actual human curiosity. I ain't buying it.